modamaglogo.jpg (9233 bytes)

















Feature Review | Fear Dot Com
Written by: Brian Orndorf

Rated: 1/10     

Detective Mike Reilly (Stephen Dorff, “Deuces Wild”) has just discovered something horrible. When people log onto the website feardotcom.com, they witness unspeakable acts of torture, then only have 48 hours to live after viewing. Teaming up with Terry (Natascha McElhone, “Ronin”), a Department Of Health officer, the two hit the streets, the internet, and the deepest recesses of their own fears to find out just who is behind this ghastly site.

Besides being a wildly dated concept, “Fear Dot Com” is an awfully ridiculous horror film that thinks itself grandly mysterious and bone-shakingly horrifying. I hate to break it to the filmmakers, but when a film contains the line “Get away from me! Where are you?,” and is mostly shot in a murky fog where you can’t see anything (there‘s a hint of forthcoming quality if I ever saw one), then scared is the last thing I‘m likely to be. Directed by William Malone, “Fear Dot Com” continues the filmmaker’s descent into terror, as Malone was a creative hand in the “Tales From the Crypt” television series, and director of the decent “House On Haunted Hill” remake from 1999. What aspect of “Fear Dot Com” appealed to Malone, I will never understand. An ultra silly melting pot of cop clichés (would you believe they have the cops eating donuts?), horror clichés (Stephen Rea plays the mad scientist here, in a performance that stinks of a need to make car payments), and endless plot holes and simple-minded dialog, “Fear Dot Com” is a mess. A mess that requires miles of suspended disbelief. But Malone doesn’t earn this privilege, as every time I allowed the film to take a leap of faith with its story or character rationale, I was repaid with even shakier motivations and more preposterous plot developments. Shame on me!

“Fear Dot Com” could easily qualify for a flat-out-disaster award, if it wasn’t so damned headstrong. Though it sometimes reaches moronic fever pitches where only laughter is the cure, the film refuses to wink at the audience, firmly believing in its voodoo website mumbo-jumbo as a viably chilling idea. Malone, stealing from himself, trots out the very same fast cutting, ghost tricks he used in “Haunted Hill,” this time with more elaborate special effects, as if to cover up the film’s total lack of believability. I kept waiting for the fun to kick in, when the investigation, carefully set up in the opening act of the film, would hit twists and turns as the two leads try to find out why this site is bonkers. But those moments never come, because Malone is more interested in his ghost story, even if the script isn’t exactly written that way.

Though I’m sure no one is coming into the film hoping for grand performances, “Fear Dot Com” does stand out for it’s rather incompetent ones. McElhone, a young, decently-gifted actress who has made good impressions before (“The Devil‘s Own,” “Surviving Picasso“), is stuck here in perpetual mouth-agape stances, uttering the phrase “oh my god!” so many times that I smell a drinking game on the horizon. It’s truly scary to see Malone misuse her so terribly.

Yes, it’s really about a killer internet webpage. It is difficult to take “Fear Dot Com” seriously, especially when the most horrifying thing on the web isn’t a deadly website, but those monthly AOL fees.

COMMENTS
Date/Time of Posting:  Sep 01 2002 / 16:27:49
IP Address:  12.226.0.215
name = Jibby Jab
Email =
comments = Yup, a stinkeroo. You could make a drinking game out of the plot holes, improbable action choices, and sheer unlikelihoods (an autopsy conducted in a dark room?....).

Date/Time of Posting:  Sep 07 2002 / 00:48:05
IP Address:  68.5.204.166
name = OblivionX
comments = I have never *EVER* seen a worse movie. WORSE than 13 ghosts. I dont understand how someone could have read this script and said "Lets make this a movie". It's mind-boggling.

Date/Time of Posting:  Oct 19 2002 / 12:39:36
IP Address:  63.227.41.115
name = bijoux
Email = bijoux66@hotmail.com
comments = I've seen porn with more beleivable plot.  Undeniably the worst "movie" i have ever wasted time on.

    Got Something to Say? (Include Name of Article)

Name:

Email:

Subject:

Comments:

blank.gif (43 bytes)

                Copyright © 2002 Modamag.com
                  home.gif (184 bytes)