Feature
Review | Below
Written by: Brian
Orndorf
The year is 1943, and a United States submarine is out on duty
patrolling the seas. Upon receiving a distress call, the boat picks up
three survivors from a nearby wreck and welcomes them with caution.
The survivors, lead by a lone woman (Olivia Williams, “Rushmore”),
are shrouded in mystery as they try to integrate with the crew
(including Jason Flemyng, Scott Foley, Matthew Davis and Zach
Galifianakis). When a German is discovered amongst the three, the
captain of the boat (Bruce Greenwood, “Thirteen Days”) kills him
immediately. With that death comes a series of strange happenings on
the boat, believed by many in the crew to be ghosts. When the
incidents become increasingly violent, forcing the submarine to the
ocean floor, the crew must race against time and battle each other to
try and save themselves from death at every turn.
Haunted house movies are tough to produce. I don’t envy anyone
trying to make a film that uses only the dark to scare its audience.
“Below” is basically mining the same terrain that “The Sixth
Sense” and “The Others” (and even last week’s “The Ring”)
rode to box office glory. It forgoes gigantic CG monsters and assorted
nonsense to form its evil, and I can respect that. It take real
resourcefulness and guts to stay so subtle, and for the first hour, I
was intrigued by what surprises “Below” had in store.
The picture was directed by David Twohy, and he is a filmmaker who
has heaps of love for the sci-fi genre. His first film, “The
Arrival,” was a pulpy, fun alien invasion flick that only suffered
from star Charlie Sheen’s limitations. His follow up was “Pitch
Black,” a film you couldn‘t pay me enough to watch again.
“Black” was a mess, featuring bad actors, soft writing, and
obscured special effects all clamoring for screen time. “Below”
cannot maintain any sort of high quality, as it makes the same
mistakes that “Pitch Black” did. The effects are never that
convincing (that is when you can make them out in the grainy darkness)
and the acting is frustratingly modern, shying away from the period
rigidness that might have made this story go down easier. Like “The
Arrival” and “Pitch Black,” “Below” is a tale that would
have been better suited for the small screen, where creepouts are
more effective with the intimate setting. Twohy loves his darkness,
but he resorts to loud shocks on the soundtrack to get most of his
scares (again, like "The Ring"), and that gets tiresome and
loathsome quickly.
The story’s thinness also bothered me. This is a ghost story, but
half of the film is spent explaining where the ghosts are coming from,
taking long steps to spell out what’s going on in the submarine.
Either you spend time with the ghosts or you sit around talking about
them, you tell me what’s more exciting? Take away the scares, and
you have a defective WWII submarine thriller as well. Last summer’s
“K-19,” as misguided as it was, at least explored the
claustrophobic tension of sub life with success. Twohy doesn’t
bother. He does have the occasional shot or idea that keeps the focus
back on the film, like one scene where an officer is so scared of the
poltergeists, he literally runs out of the sub… while it’s a mile
below the surface of the water. But little bits here and there just
aren’t enough.
Co-written by celebrated filmmaker Darren Aronofsky (“Pi,”
“Requiem For A Dream”), I expected more tension from “Below,”
not just lukewarm frights, and a backstory that needs so much
exposition, it eats up more of the running time than any other element
in the picture. It simply doesn’t work hard enough.
Grade: 5 out of 10
|